|
Reader Info
|
Entries associated with the tag "Tribune redesign":September 23rd - 12:06 p.m.
The one unquestionably positive thing I have to say about the Trib redesign--and I might be alone in not being wholly skeptical*--is that they're not neglecting obits (can't link directly to it, but in the tour look under Front Section, Legacies). As someone who's mostly trained in features/literary journalism (including an immensely valuable and fun internship at the soon-to-fold Tempo section), I have an innate fear of "newsworthiness," and the fact that dying + being kind of interesting as a person is still considered newsworthy means that obits might be our last best hope for the form (until the economy gets better I'll have to scrap my plans for Obit Monthly). Anyway, support your local obits section, sometimes you find amazing things. *Incidentally, re pictures: Some people will tell you that big pictures, because of eye-tracking charts, are useless. In other words, eyes don't stay on pictures very long. But that's crazy--of course they don't, the density of information is much lower. That doesn't mean they can't be used well. Just because a John Leax poem takes me a thousandth of the time to read as a book doesn't mean it's 1,000 times less good. More photo-oriented journalism, I think, would have made Americans more skeptical of the Iraq War, just as the unprecedentedly visual coverage of the Vietnam War undermined the official line. I could get deep into the history and ethics of that, but kinda busy r/n. There's plenty of good literature on it. And also: sometimes you just want to look at pictures, so I wanted to share my and my fiancee's gripe that the Trib's comprehensive Emmy red carpet photo gallery could stand to have wider pictures, kthxbye. September 22nd - 6:54 p.m.
Um... that's a hell of a lot of clip art. I'm not saying it can't work, but they're putting an immense burden on their photo editors and illustrators. From the Crain's article it's hard to judge the product generally--the pages they show are pretty blah, but that's because the F1 is about water bottles, and good luck with that. If it was about a very pretty person or something blowing up, it might look awesome. If the Trib puts a lot of effort into the transparent, attractive visual display of quantitative information, it could be an appealing and engaging product, and certainly more commuter-friendly. If they make it look like USA Today only with cheap clip art instead of cheap illustrations, it'll look less like RedEye and more like a corporate brochure. The New York Times has been a model of the former in recent years, especially its sports magazine, Play (more). September 17th - 1:29 p.m.
What would be awesome would be to call the first section News! The front section [of the Tribune] will contain business and local news, which currently are separate sections, as well as national and foreign news. A sports section and a features section called “Live!” will round out the paper. Sunday’s Perspective section will be cut. |
|
©1996-2009 Creative Loafing Media All Rights Reserved. We welcome your comments and suggestions.