In Friday morning's Chicago Tribune, Richard Wronski notes the un-success of the RTA's "Moving Beyond Congestion" lobbying effort in Springfield. Today's email brings news that the Concerned Commuters of Northeastern Illinois will be taking their petitions to Governor Blagojevich's office at the State of Illinois building Monday morning at 10 am. CCNI is the Illinois Public Interest Research Group, the Center for Neighborhood Technology, and "20+ community group representatives and transit activists."
Transit Doomsday has been proclaimed so often, it's easy to forget that it could really come. If the CTA is reduced from an alternative way of getting around to a rush-hour-only convenience, then Chicago will have devolved into a bloated version of Springfield or Indianapolis. These officials and activists are fighting the good fight, but they're caught between a rock and a hard place.
Specifically, they're asking state taxpayers to pony up money that will be managed by Mayor Daley and his appointees, who over the years have shown little ability to listen or to involve the public in setting sensible transit priorities. (What would a real CTA director sound like? Check out this from Beachwood Reporter.) And it's not just bad CTA priorities like the express from Block 37, it's general. I for one would trade every green roof and solar panel in the damn city for a transit system good enough to make driving seem like a fool's errand.





and otherwise. Recently updated blogs are in bold text.
It has never been about use, and certainly not about maintenance (except for projects as graftable as new construction.)
They spent more on monstrous copper gargoyles for the new library than on books. Huge new L stations are being built while they can't make the trains and busses they already have run.
Several years ago, a new guy was made head of CTA maintenance who was actually going to clean it up and make it work. The entrenched grafters and loafers drove him out in less than a year.
I oppose the Olympics bid because I don't think that with the current "administration" it can be anything but a boondoggle.
I thought the Crain's front-page article a few months ago was the best coverage I've yet seen as far as explaining how the CTA's own choices have contributed to its decline. I'm actually of a mind that what's needed is an actual "transit doomsday", because (a) at this point no threat or worry can possibly be believable to taxpayers or their elected representatives, and (b) nothing less would cause the wholesale housecleaning or personnel and practices and assumptions which the CTA needs.
On paying for operations, there are a whole bunch of problems starting with the Unions and their pension to customer lawsuits. If you want to make things better, they should skip Springfield and go see their Congressman.
One of the values of the Crain's coverage, for me, was to blow apart the conventional wisdom as parroted endlessly by CTA apologists: that the problem is just federal pork leading the agency around by the nose as you describe. In fact the CTA has also been regularly robbing from operations and maintenance budgets to pay for capital stuffhaving little or nothing to do with any federal funding; that in _combination_ with the federally-enabled boondoggles is what Kruesi and everyone close to him should have been fired for years ago.
now is the best time to contact elected officials as the campaign to get adequate funding is shifting into high gear. call blagojevich (217-782-0244 or 312-814-2121) and submit a comment to him here, asking for adequate funding. remember to ask for a gas tax increase to pay for transit. then call your representatives (find them here). this is the only way we can get a decent public transit system.
blagojevich's comment form:
http://www.illinois.gov/gov/contactthegovernor.cfm...
find your representatives
http://www.civicfootprint.org
Let me see if I have this straight, we should tax the alternatives so that one of the most poorly run (and physically repulsive) systems of transport on earth can continue to provide miserable performance.
What if the CTA instituted some reforms first, then the voters considered whether to increase funding? Are you sure throwing good money after bad "is the only way we can get a decent public transit system" How about performing routine maintenance and cleaning up the vomit first?
JBP