Reader Info
Advertising, subscriptions, staff, privacy policy, contact info, freelancers' guidelines, etc.




News Bites
Michael Miner on the media | RSS | Archive | Search

September 2nd - 9:08 p.m.

By all accounts Edwin Guthman was a great journalist. He won a Pulitzer Prize with the Seattle Times in 1950, he was national editor of the Los Angeles Times as it rose to glory in the late 60s and 70s, he ran the editorial page of the Philadelphia Inquirer in the 1980s, and in semiretirement he taught journalism at the University of Southern California for 20 years. For a time he was president of the Los Angeles Ethics Commission.

Guthman died Sunday at the age of 89. Knowing about him only what the obituaries tell me, I envy him his career. But there is one period of it -- or should I say one breach of it? -- that deserves a teaching moment. In 1956, the LA Times obit tells us, Guthman was investigating the Teamsters union and he was introduced to Robert Kennedy, the staff attorney to a Senate subcommittee about to launch an inquiry into labor corruption. Guthman and Kennedy got on, "and they began to share information." When Kennedy became attorney general in 1961 he hired Guthman as his press secretary, and Guthman worked for him for the next four years. In 1971 he published an affectionate memoir of those years, We Band of Brothers. The AP obit tells us that throughout his life he wore a tie clip President John Kennedy had given him.

There's a rule of thumb in journalism -- situationally applied, often disregarded -- that holds that journalists should draw a line between themselves and the governments they cover, and once they cross that line they should stay on the other side. There's a reason for this rule, and Guthman's obituaries inadvertently demonstrate it. With Guthman as national editor, the Times aggressively covered Watergate and in late 1972 broke a major story. The next year Guthman discovered that he ranked third on President Nixon's enemies list. A former Times colleague told the Times that Guthman "was very proud" of that. But, the obit went on, "Guthman was also outraged. . . . He said any law-abiding American citizen would resent being targeted for retribution from his government."

That list existed because the Nixon White House was paranoid. But even paranoiacs have their reasons. Nixon hated and feared the Kennedys, and the hard-charging Times editor making his life miserable was a Kennedy man. That wasn't just Nixon's paranoia talking -- it was also Guthman's years on the Kennedy payroll.





The News Bites blogroll
Harold, Daily by Harold Henderson

The View From Here by Andrew Patner




Branzburg v. Hayes, the split U.S. Supreme Court decision (1972) generally construed by journalists and judges alike as affirming some sort of reporter's privilege in federal courts.

U.S. Appellate Judge Richard Posner's influential opinion in McKevitt v. Pallasch (2003) telling those journalists and judges they were wrong -- there is no such privilege.

John Milton's Areopagitica (1643), one of the earliest and most eloquent arguments for a free press. Said Milton: "As good almost kill a man as kill a good book; who kills a man kills a reasonable creature, God's image; but he who destroys a good book, kills reason itself, kills the image of God, as it were in the eye."

©1996-2009 Creative Loafing Media All Rights Reserved.   We welcome your comments and suggestions.