In an April 1998 review of Abbas Kiarostami's Taste of Cherry in New York magazine, David Denby scoffed at the idea that other critics were calling it a masterpiece. "This is a movie of great interest—an original work,” he said, “but it lacks the courage, the surprise, the ravenous hunger for life, of a serious work of movie art.” Almost nine years later, in the New Yorker's listings, Denby promotes a Kiarostami retrospective at MOMA by calling the same film one of Kiarostami’s best, noting that he “redeems humanism by combining it with enchanting formal play” and “can turn the simplest action into a philosophical quest.”
It’s not quite a reversal, acknowledged or otherwise, but it does suggest a changed attitude, and a welcome one, perhaps spurred along by a desire to counter Bush's demonization of what he chooses to call "Iran." Or perhaps Denby has decided that a nonserious work of movie art can also be a philosophical quest that combines humanism with "enchanting formal play." Still, there is one strange recurring element in his account of the film: his claim that the protagonist “tries to induce strangers to help him commit suicide." This is a curious and decidedly nonhumanist description of a project he described accurately in another review. In fact, the protagonist offers to pay each stranger he meets to retrieve him from a hole in the ground if he’s still alive the next morning or to bury him if he’s dead.
In 1998, around the same time that Denby's New York review appeared, he was lamenting the alleged decline of the art film in a long New Yorker piece called "The Moviegoers." More recently he's held forth on what he calls the new narrative disorder in movies. Noting that Alain Resnais "played the most extreme (and infuriating) games with time and narrative" in his early features but apparently remaining cool as a cucumber when it comes to a recent Resnais knockoff such as Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (which owes a great deal to Resnais' Je t'aime, Je t'aime) or an antihumanist crossword puzzle like Memento, Denby shows nothing but awe and admiration for Pulp Fiction. Presumably Quentin Tarantino could teach Alain Resnais and Abbas Kiarostami a thing or two about "the courage, the surprise, the ravenous hunger for life, of a serious work of art."




Now many film-buffs even critics consider that QT as the originator of so-called "narrative disorder", but in your opinion, Mr. Rosenbaum, who really deserved the title, Resnais or some earlier filmmakers?
It's infuriating that Denby has actually seen the films of these directors and still can't weigh in a consistent, appropriate opinion on the stylistic and humanistic elements of Tarantino, Kiarostami, and Resnais. Denby's inconsistent opinions give the illusion that he floats with the wind.
As a side note: on the Criterion DVD of Taste of Cherry, there is an interview with Kiarostami. The interviewer asks an obviously idiotic question, which is something like "what do you think about Quentin Tarantino?" Kiarostami's response is quite humorous.
It's too easy to just dismiss one or the other out of hand, using the work of one filmmaker to shoot down the work of another. Perhaps the content is contradictory, but there's a difference between contradiction and hypocrisy. We should strive to hold such seeming antitheses in our head and heart, and examine them accordingly, in all their complexity.
Having also recently re-seen Resnais's glorious and groundbreaking "Marienbad" and "Muriel," I think Resnais's so-called "narrative disorder" is infinitely preferable to the ugly tone of "Pulp Fiction." QT's "Jackie Brown" at least had characters worth caring about.
Keith's ongoing coverage of the Kiarostami retro (including his interview with The Big 'Bas himself) can be found on House Next Door: mattzollerseitz.blogspot.com
My notes on HOMEWORK and THE TRAVELLER are on my blog: shooting.alsolikelife.com
What Bush is choosing to call `Iran' is chiefly a narrow-minded fundamentalist like himself, not a complex society of millions of diverse individuals that is every bit as multicultural as the U.S. We rightly get upset when foreigners assume that 'America' is Bush, so we should also pay attention when Bush demonizes millions of people in the distorted and limited image of one of its leaders.
Also, pulp characters who have sudden religious awakenings and essentially start dictating the themes of their own sequels are rare in popular cinema.