Reader Info
Advertising, subscriptions, staff, privacy policy, contact info, freelancers' guidelines, etc.




On Film
The Reader's movie blog | RSS | Archive | Search

Entries associated with the tag "Errol Morris":

November 19th - 9:57 a.m.

IndieWire reports that the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has announced its short list of 15 nominees for the best documentary of 2008. To judge from the ones I've seen, this already seems a more worthwhile batch of stuff to check out than whatever crowd-pleasing commercial behemoths will wind up competing for Best Picture. It's interesting to note that, of the year's five highest grossing documentaries—in order, Religulous, Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, Shine a Light, Young @ Heart, and Man on Wire—only the last of them made even this preliminary cut.

The short-listed documentaries are:

At the Death House Door (pictured) by Peter Gilbert and Steve James;

The Betrayal by Ellen Kuras;

Blessed Is the Match: The Life and Death of Hannah Senesh by Roberta Grossman;

Encounters at the End of the World by Werner Herzog;

Fuel by Josh Tickell;

The Garden by Scott Hamilton Kennedy;

Glass: A Portrait of Philip in Twelve Parts by Scott Hicks;

I.O.U.S.A. by Patrick Creadon;

In a Dream by Jeremiah Zagar;

Made in America by Stacy Peralta;

Man on Wire by James Marsh;

Pray the Devil Back to Hell by Gini Reticker;

Standard Operating Procedure by Errol Morris;

They Killed Sister Dorothy by Daniel Junge; and

Trouble the Water by Carol Deal and Tia Lessin.

April 28th - 7:39 p.m.

This weekend the New York Times reported on the controversy surrounding Standard Operating Procedure, Errol Morris's new documentary about the Abu Ghraib case. "I paid the 'bad apples' because they asked to be paid, and they would not have been interviewed otherwise," Morris said in a statement. He considers the possibility that he should have revealed the payments in the credits, though he says he "didn't feel the necessity."

The story highlights an interesting and little-remarked-upon dichotomy between  journalism and movie documentaries: newspaper, magazine, and Tv interviewers rarely pay subjects, while film producers commonly do. In fact, the dicier issue seems to be whether the New Yorker violated its standards by publishing in its March 24 issue an excellent piece by Morris and Philip Gourevitch that drew from the interviews Morris collected for the film. Especially fascinating is its treatment of Specialist Sabrina Harman of the 372nd Military Police Company, who began snapping digital photos inside Abu Ghraib as a way of indemnifying herself against what she knew were abuses but wound up incriminating herself instead.

The Times is also hosting a blog by Morris, where he considers in two posts his technique of staging reenactments for the specific purpose of isolating and focusing on key moments in a complex chain of evidence. There's a fair amount of this in Standard Operating Procedure, though the stagings are mostly for emotional effect. The evidentiary burden falls mainly on the prosecution's reconstruction, by synchronizing digital photos from three soldiers' cameras, of the chain of events as prisoners were abused and ritually humiliated. And Morris's interviews with Harman and Lynndie England are chilling--paid or not, they starkly capture the dehumanizing environment inside Abu Ghraib.




On Film Blogroll

©1996-2008 Creative Loafing Media All Rights Reserved.   We welcome your comments and suggestions.