|
Reader Info
|
Entries associated with the tag "Still Life":March 5th - 9:46 p.m.
Let's start here: Jia Zhang-ke's Still Life "blows everything else out of the water"—There Will Be Blood, No Country for Old Men, all the year's Oscar competition, in fact anything you can think of of recent commercial vintage. Or maybe it's into the water, since imminent immersion's the theme—for towns immemorial along the banks of the Yangtze River, where China's Three Gorges dam project lurches toward completion, yet another of Yeats's rough, slouching beasts whose hour has finally arrived. Paradoxically though, almost everyone works in demolition, gangs roving up and down the river, lighting out for whatever serendipitous employment territory they can find. No country for old men here—for "nostalgics," as one character calls them, living on memories of a world past vanishing. But yuan, the paper currency—always time for those, every denomination a picture of some natural wonder or other threatened with extinction. And even in this brave new world of capital, where "change" is the official watchword (hello, Barack Obama) and everything's been ruthlessly commodified—three yuan for a ride to an island underwater, another three or twenty for a night in a shabby workmen's hotel—there's still that vestigial craving for the obsolete and comfy. Like those waterfall engravings on the bills ... Or maybe it's something else—the future as SF excavation site, some weird archaeological dig, like Blade Runner in reverse. Which shouldn't be surprising if you consider that Jia (in Unknown Pleasures) and his cinematographer Nelson Yu Lik-wai (in All Tomorrow's Parties—aka the "Chinese Blade Runner") have tramped over this kind of ecologically straitened turf before. Strange and otherworldly, even spiritually ravaged, like the "burned-over district" in 1840s New York state—except instead of Jesus saving, there's now unappeasable Moloch, lord of the economic flies. A variation on the technological sublime, in the 18th-century Burkean sense, combining sheer raw terror with reverential awe ... So buildings fall to rubble, or shoot off into CGI-confected space, and still the awe remains—as we've witnessed here at the Reader, our own Burgess Shale of evolutionary opportunity. One species dying, another—or maybe several, a dozen—springing to new, unruly life, like weeds in the concrete fill at the Three Gorges site. Some call them teratisms, monsters from the economic id, but I say: who's the last Morlock standing? ... assuming there's anyplace left to stand. So no place of grace in this postdiluvian world, nor home for anyone either—which obviously has to be the case, since homes are for wusses only, the "nostalgics" who make bad choices, who don't know how to cope. But random variation is the everlasting engine and capitalism the universal solvent, subverting all the wayward, clinging molecules—which brings us back to total immersion again. Just keep moving, people ... or swimming, trying to stay above the waterline. Which is why I think Still Life's a "great" movie, if not exactly a film you'd warm to. Audiences exit the theater and everyone seems mystified, vaguely drained or unsettled. Because they've seen the future and none of us is in it—or, to drag in Whitman, inadvertent apostle of dystopian transformation, of change without an end point or promise of repose: Who speak the secret of impassive earth? And we will risk the ship, ourselves and all.
January 29th - 6:11 p.m.
It's hard at many festivals apart from the biggest ones to determine whether a film is really "new" or not: "new" in relation to where? I was fortunate enough to attend the world premiere of Jia Zhangke's Still Life in Venice last year and then resee it in Toronto a week or so later. It's playing in Rotterdam now, and perhaps it will reach Chicago a year from now, or maybe a little sooner. In the busy cafe-bar of the Lantaren/Venster, the oldest of the festival's three multiscreen multiplexes (where virtually the entire festival was taking place the first year I attended, 1984), between two programs, I buy a Chinese DVD of this film, priced around $10 in Euros from a clerk who assures me that this version has English subtitles, even though they aren't mentioned on the box—something I may not be able to confirm until I'm back in Chicago next month. But then, just before a Chinese indy film called Weed starts a few minutes later, I find I'm sitting a row away from Chinese film expert and sometime Reader reviewer Shelly Kraicer, who assures me that (1) this version is subtitled, and (2) it can be bought on the streets of Beijing for about $1.10—or 80 cents if it's from a pirated source. So is this a new movie or an old one? I'm reminded of when Chantal Akerman's Jeanne Dielman, 23 quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles finally premiered in trendy New York in the 1980s, seven years after it premiered in Europe, and some reviewers were calling it "the new Chantal Akerman film."
|
|
©1996-2008 Creative Loafing Media All Rights Reserved. We welcome your comments and suggestions.