Reader Info
Advertising, subscriptions, staff, privacy policy, contact info, freelancers' guidelines, etc.




The Food Chain
The Reader's food and drink blog | RSS | Archive | Search

by Elizabeth Tamny on February 2nd 2007 - 2:19 p.m.

Digg! Digg this | Post to del.icio.us | E-mail E-mail to a friend

You have to pay to read the whole article online, but there's an interesting piece in New Scientist right now about re-creating the conceit behind the movie Super Size Me, in which filmmaker Morgan Spurlock ate nothing but McDonald's for 30 days and documented the effect on his health. The re-creation was done under very controlled scientific conditions in Sweden and had surprising results. The experiment, as I understand it from this Wall Street Journal report and other commentary, used a cross-section of volunteers who all started at roughly the same low weight, had a mechanism to measure/ensure a lack of physical activity, and had the subjects eat a certain (ginormous) number of calories of junk/fast food every day. The result: people gained weight at very different rates--the experiment affected people's health in very different ways, period. Maintaining the same inactivity and eating the same food, some people gained a lot, more than Spurlock, some gained half that, some a little. Changes in cholesterol levels were wildly different too; one subject even came out with a lower reading. This whole thing doesn't surprise me too much, but it's intriguing enough that I'm tempted to pony up the $4.95.


Images:


 
Comments
(please read our policy)
jennpb
February 2nd - 4:23 p.m.
Or, instead of paying for the article, look for it in Chicago Public Library's online database ProQuest Research Library. Looks like they've got full text of New Scientist! Unfortunately the dbase doesn't include content from the Jan.27 issue yet...
chip
February 2nd - 5:14 p.m.
I'm with you Liz in being unsurprised by the results from the Swedish study. Actually, go here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Size_Me, and scroll down to alternative experiments. Seems that many people have had entirely different results from dining exclusively at McDonalds.
liz!
February 2nd - 7:08 p.m.
Ohhh...what a great idea (CPL). I'm a yooge fan of their remote access thing. Shoulda thought of that. Thanks!
liz!
February 2nd - 7:16 p.m.
Interesting! (wiki-wiki) Veryyy interesting! Thanks for pointing me there. The thing that seems diff about this Swedish study (other than all the experiment controls) is that they weren't trying to limit anything or make healthy choices...rather the opposite. The calorie intake seems to be somewhere twixt 5-6,000 calories and supplemented with other junk food when McD's just couldn't supply enough! Wild. Definitely wanna read the article.

Would you...like some fries?



The Food Chain blogroll
Recently updated blogs are in bold text.

©1996-2009 Creative Loafing Media All Rights Reserved.   We welcome your comments and suggestions.