Reader Info
Advertising, subscriptions, staff, privacy policy, contact info, freelancers' guidelines, etc.




News Bites
Michael Miner on the media | RSS | Archive | Search


I wouldn't call it a death watch, but Mark Fitzgerald, Chicago correspondent of Editor & Publisher, has done a heck of a job keeping tabs on the Chicago Defender. It's not a happy task. The last editor, Roland Martin--who's still around Chicago as a radio personality on WVON--was a bundle of energy who dreamed big. But Martin left the Detroit-controlled paper months ago, and what has Fitzgerald reported lately?

* In April, that the entire accounting department was fired over a scheme involving paychecks cut in the names of ex-employees.  

* In May, that the new editor, Lou Ransom, had announced "stepped-up deadlines" for the four-days-weekly Defender that might put the freshness of the product in some jeopardy. Ransom said in a staff memo, "Friday, we will put together the Monday paper with provisions made to account for late-breaking weekend news." (I got a copy of that memo too, but Ransom wouldn't return my calls to talk about it.) In the same article, Fitzgerald mentioned that the Defender had fired its only full-time reporter a few days before and reported that it was thinking of dropping back to two issues a week.

* On June 28, that nothing new had been posted on the Defender Web site--a Roland Martin innovation--since June 8.

A fresh story was finally spotted a month later, on July 11.

 


Comments
(please read our policy)
Sad
July 13th - 12:43 p.m.
I worked at the Defender for more years than I care to remember and left about eight years ago. The commitment level from everyone involved dipped lower and lower and hit bottom (in my opinion) in a silly family feud over control of the paper that was more about money than anything else. While Martin did infuse the paper with new life, I personally saw it more as pimping the little profile the paper had, and I think I was proven out by his gadfly-like acceptance of every radio and tv gig that came his way. The paper, in my opinion, still has value and purpose especially in this day and age when the black community seems adrift in so many areas. Maybe if I could win that $90 mil Mega Game...
Bill Press
July 13th - 7:52 p.m.
Funny. The only time the Defender got mentioned is when Martin was on TV and radio. It's called free publicity. Everyone has figured it out, and you criticize someone for doing it?

The paper was a gross after thought. If there was no appearances on radio and TV, then how else to get the message out?
oh well
July 23rd - 12:08 a.m.
sad so sad.



The News Bites blogroll
Harold, Daily by Harold Henderson

The View From Here by Andrew Patner




Branzburg v. Hayes, the split U.S. Supreme Court decision (1972) generally construed by journalists and judges alike as affirming some sort of reporter's privilege in federal courts.

U.S. Appellate Judge Richard Posner's influential opinion in McKevitt v. Pallasch (2003) telling those journalists and judges they were wrong -- there is no such privilege.

John Milton's Areopagitica (1643), one of the earliest and most eloquent arguments for a free press. Said Milton: "As good almost kill a man as kill a good book; who kills a man kills a reasonable creature, God's image; but he who destroys a good book, kills reason itself, kills the image of God, as it were in the eye."

©1996-2008 Creative Loafing Media All Rights Reserved.   We welcome your comments and suggestions.