Reader Info
Advertising, subscriptions, staff, privacy policy, contact info, freelancers' guidelines, etc.




News Bites
Michael Miner on the media | RSS | Archive | Search


The screaming headlines in Wednesday's Sun-Times were misleading at best.

Page one: "DREW'S PALS WORE WIRE." On page eight, where the story began, "DREW'S CHILLING 'I SHOULD HAVE HAD THAT B---- CREMATED.'"

The front page was nothing but headlines. "Two of Drew Peterson's closest friends," said the drop head, "recorded months of intimate conversations with him for the State Police."

Smaller headlines at the bottom of the front page announced: "On His Murdered Wife Kathleen: 'I should have had the bitch cremated.'" 

And,

"On the Investigation of Kathleen's Drowning: 'It was in a dry bathtub, what a bunch of idiots.'"

Wow! What else is on the tape? 

Apparently, not even the above.  Read the story. The dry bathtub line is something Peterson's pal Paula Stark says Peterson told her in 2004, when Kathleen Savio, his third wife, was found dead. The should-have-had-her-cremated line is something pal Len Wawczak says he remembers Peterson telling him when authorities decided early last November -- after Peterson's fourth wife, Stacy Peterson, disappeared -- to exhume Savio's body. The story indicates that Wawczak and Stark (who are married) started wearing wires later in November.

As far as a reader can tell, reporter Joe Hosey didn't hear the tapes, didn't read a transcript of the tapes, and didn't even confirm there are tapes, those spurious quotations notwithstanding. A token of the Sun-Times's meretriciousness is that despite the paper's ostentatious claims that the story was a "Sun-Times Exclusive," Hosey's a reporter for Joliet's Herald News, a Sun-Times News Group daily that also carried the story


Comments
(please read our policy)
Danny
July 24th - 6:18 p.m.
"It was in a dry bathtub, what a bunch of idiots."

If he did say this (and if he didn't kill her), why - as a police officer - didn't he work the system to get her death investigated more thoroughly? Sure, they were divorced, but she was the mother of his two small kids.
Pam
July 24th - 9:11 p.m.
Danny - you are wrong. Drew and Kathleen were NOT divorced yet. They separated and then she met her untimely demise. Alas, Drew did not have to pay alimony or child support ... plus he collected on insurance policies on Kathleen that supposedly are being held in trust for their children.
Disputo
July 24th - 9:46 p.m.
"If he did say this (and if he didn't kill her), why - as a police officer - didn't he work the system to get her death investigated more thoroughly?"

That question pretty much answers itself, doesn't it?

The guy has condemned himself with his own asinine behavior. Unfortunately that cannot (rightly so) be used in court.

I've always figured that a body would never be found, and that the cops would have to rely on Peterson's own boastful arrogance to convict him. I just hope these publicity-seeking numbskulls haven't screwed everything up.
Rich
July 25th - 3:53 a.m.
Lenny and Paula are frauds! I know them personally....I am pretty sure Drew is guilty, but these two are no saints. The are money hungry a-holes!

Rich
John
August 1st - 3:59 a.m.
I know who killed Stacey...A crackhead girl with blonde hair today told me everything. It was Mike! He admitted it to her + Dave. She is hiding out from the Cops, they want her to testify to the grand Jury in Drews case.
Walter
September 30th - 2:39 p.m.
September 19, 2008

BY DAN ROZEK Staff Reporter/drozek@suntimes.com
Drew Peterson's own words may be used against him.

Investigators have amassed an "extensive" collection of secretly recorded conversations involving Peterson, a Will County judge disclosed at a hearing Thursday.

It's the first independent verification that police investigating Peterson used electronic surveillance in an effort to collect evidence against the former Bolingbrook cop.

In July, Len Wawczak and Paula Stark, former friends of Peterson, claimed they had secretly taped months of conversations with him for investigators probing the October 2007 disappearance of his fourth wife, Stacy, and the 2004 drowning death of his third wife, Kathleen Savio. Authorities haven't confirmed their claims, but on Thursday, Judge Richard Schoenstedt said investigators used court-approved electronic eavesdropping to compile tapes, CDs and DVDs focusing on Peterson.

"It is extensive," Schoenstedt said of the material. He didn't disclose how the recordings were obtained.



The News Bites blogroll
Harold, Daily by Harold Henderson

The View From Here by Andrew Patner





Branzburg v. Hayes, the split U.S. Supreme Court decision (1972) generally construed by journalists and judges alike as affirming some sort of reporter's privilege in federal courts.

U.S. Appellate Judge Richard Posner's influential opinion in McKevitt v. Pallasch (2003) telling those journalists and judges they were wrong -- there is no such privilege.

John Milton's Areopagitica (1643), one of the earliest and most eloquent arguments for a free press. Said Milton: "As good almost kill a man as kill a good book; who kills a man kills a reasonable creature, God's image; but he who destroys a good book, kills reason itself, kills the image of God, as it were in the eye."

©1996-2009 Creative Loafing Media All Rights Reserved.   We welcome your comments and suggestions.