Reader Info
Advertising, subscriptions, staff, privacy policy, contact info, freelancers' guidelines, etc.




News Bites
Michael Miner on the media | RSS | Archive | Search

Entries associated with the tag "Rachel Barton Pine":

June 6th - 2:32 p.m.

The comments on the Reader's Clout City blog can get pretty rambunctious. Two months ago, James Sachay, former assistant commissioner of Chicago's Department of Aviation, named the Reader as codefendant in a defamation suit because of one of them. The comment, dated January 31 and "signed" by Sachay, said in part:

"I am voting for Frank Coconate. I am sorry I challenged his petitions under false pretenses. I am sorry I stole money from Roman Pucinski. I am sorry I got illegal contracts for my son and acted criminally at O'Hare."

Coconate was fired by the city two years ago from his job as a sewer safety worker. This past winter he donned the mantle of gadfly reformer taking on the machine and ran a failed race for Democratic committeeman in the 41st Ward. Sachay alleged in his suit that Coconate was the actual author of the blog post, though Coconate denies it; the Reader's supposed offense was allowing it to appear. 

But the Reader argued in its motion to dismiss that it enjoys immunity under Section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act, which draws a distinction between a publisher that selects what to publish and the proprietor of a public Web forum. This distinction holds even if the Web site provider makes some effort to police the site. (Someone here took down the offending comment sometime after it appeared.)

On June 3 the Reader was dismissed as a defendant in response to a new motion filed by Sachay. His amended suit against only Coconate will continue.

For more on Web forums and the law, check out my column on the tempest that followed a Tribune profile of violinist Rarchel Barton Pine.

April 28th - 6:48 p.m.
Chicagoist has noticed that the wave of comments that flooded the Tribune Web site like the backwash from a swamped storm sewer in response to Howard Reich's March 30 profile of Rachel Barton Pine has mysteriously disappeared. It's possible to post a new comment (I tested the waters), but the old stream has been taken down -- or something. Bill Adee, the editor responsible for overseeing reader boards, said, "It still exists,  just not at the end of the story where it is supposed to be. We are trying to figure out why it dropped off the bottom like that. We found a few other instances where it has happened now that it was brought to our attention."
 
If it exists, why can't I find it? I got back to Adee. "Well, that's the problem," he replied. "A regular user can't find it because it's not at the end of the story."




The News Bites blogroll
Harold, Daily by Harold Henderson

The View From Here by Andrew Patner




Branzburg v. Hayes, the split U.S. Supreme Court decision (1972) generally construed by journalists and judges alike as affirming some sort of reporter's privilege in federal courts.

U.S. Appellate Judge Richard Posner's influential opinion in McKevitt v. Pallasch (2003) telling those journalists and judges they were wrong -- there is no such privilege.

John Milton's Areopagitica (1643), one of the earliest and most eloquent arguments for a free press. Said Milton: "As good almost kill a man as kill a good book; who kills a man kills a reasonable creature, God's image; but he who destroys a good book, kills reason itself, kills the image of God, as it were in the eye."

©1996-2008 Creative Loafing Media All Rights Reserved.   We welcome your comments and suggestions.