I was happy to be at the Goodman's Owen Theatre for the premiere of Million Dollar Quartet--until the music started. A commercial production by Dee Gee Theatricals, MDQ focuses on the day in 1956 when Elvis Presley, Carl Perkins, Johnny Cash, and Jerry Lee Lewis jammed together at Sun Records founder Sam Phillips's Memphis Recording Service. The show's got a cast of wonderful musicians, and a piano-chewing turn by Levi Kreis as the irrepressible Lewis. But most of the two dozen classic songs in this revue are delivered at the ear-splitting, cringe-inducing, stadium-concert volume that's become way too common for shows in small, acoustically sensitive venues like the Owen. I'm talking about amplification that distorts the music, assaults the audience (Didn't they crank the volume at Gitmo?), and sends you home with a tinny ringing in your ears. In the case of MDQ, it's also historically inaccurate. I left the Goodman thinking we need to end the tyranny of the great and powerful--and probably deafened--guy in the sound booth. It doesn't look like this'll change unless we speak up, so let's hear from you now--while we can still hear at all.





Why amplify anything at all in the theatre most of the time? Bring back Ethel Merman!
Isn't the Reader supposed to be targeted to young demos who like rock and roll and pop culture? Maybe that's why your company's in bankruptcy. How about giving your target demographic what it wants the way RedEye does?
just to name a few.
You were not at a concert at a bar, you were at theatre production. While I certainly understand the stereotype of the deaf sound guy, you should know that it would not be tolerated in a theatrical production. I also happen to know the op for this production, and he is certainly not deaf, or a tyrant.
Whether this production is too loud or not is a matter or opinion, but as a theatre reviewer, you should know who is responsible for what, and how, you hear a theatrical production.
I'm that tyrant in question, the sound operator for Million Dollar Quartet. Stagehand is absolutely right, it is never the sound engineer/operator's responsibility to make a decision such as "let's be really loud during this show," it is our role simply to
effectively execute and maintain a consistent mix over the course of the run.
You have absolutely made my day with this conversation (I LOVE being accused of tyranny, and power, it's really funny if you only knew the truth), though I do have some (I hope well-reasoned) points to make about sound's relationship to theater here and why it's such a hot-button topic, and some suggestions for further exploration so that audience, critics, designers, and producers can start having a meaningful dialogue about why shows are getting so loud and the ethical, aesthetic and financial implications of "Louder or Softer."
In any case, the short answer is that it's too complicated for a blog comment, so I'll continue this discussion for anyone who wants to hear over at:
http://theaterforthefuture.com/should-i-dress-as-s...
Shame.
This is tantamount to a patron of the theater taking umbrage with you if they did not enjoy a show you which you gave a positive review and then declared you a tyrant of opinion. Sort of.
You should know better. Call out the designer not the operator who's just doing his job. And doing it well, i.e. the way he was instructed to.
Yuck.