Reader Info
Advertising, subscriptions, staff, privacy policy, contact info, freelancers' guidelines, etc.




Entries associated with the tag "New York Yankees":

June 9th - 8:44 p.m.

The Cubs are in first place, the White Sox are in first place, and so, Aware One, am I -- in first place for the Golden BAT Award, that is. The BAT, or Baseball Acumen Test, as my friend and former Hot Type columnist Neil Tesser coined it, determines which Chicago sportswriter is best at picking the winners in baseball. Hey, I've won it before, in 1984 I believe, and at this point, through the first week in June, I have all six division leaders in baseball. That's right, six for six.

Yes, I have the White Sox finishing first in the American League Central -- more for the weakness of the competition, which I've thus far been proved true about, than for the strength of the Sox, which they've flexed recently -- and the Cubs in the National League Central. The others are all no-brainers, to my way of thinking: the Boston Red Sox and Los Angeles Angels in the AL, the Philadelphia Phillies and Arizona Diamondbacks in the NL. True, I'm far from being eight for eight, with the New York Yankees my wild-card pick in the AL and the Cincinnati Reds in the NL. Yet who picks second-place teams? Besides, the Reds are ascendant now that Dusty Baker has finally called up Jay Bruce and Homer Bailey (predicted, with all else, here), and who can count out my AL pick of the New York Yankees, with their deep pockets and resources for midseason trades? In any case, they don't figure in my World Series pick: Cubs and Bosox. So, no, it's not yet July 4, the traditional date for baseball league leaders to crow about their leads, but I'll take what I got -- and go from there. What else was the blog invented for other than to blow one's own horn? 

April 1st - 3:24 p.m.

Will we be following Yankee slugger Alex Rodriguez's pursuit of the home run record over the next few years the way we did with Barry Bonds--with steroids-inspired doubt?

If so, barring new allegations, our skepticism will be due largely to Jose Canseco, the admitted steroid user turned whistle-blower who's discussed A-Rod in each of his two books. In Juiced Canseco doesn't accuse A-Rod of anything but does say his reputation as being clean is unmerited. In the just-released Vindicated Canseco claims that A-Rod asked him about how to get steroids and that he introduced A-Rod to a dealer.

Canseco echoes these statements in a new interview with Jeremy Schaap for ESPN's E60, much of which is available here. Canseco says that A-Rod is "not who he portrays himself to be--not even close, by the way." He adds: "Ask him, point blank, did he ever use steroids. See what he says. Then ask him, at the same time, right after he gives an answer to that question, did [Jose Canseco] ever introduce you to a known steroid dealer. See what he says to both." Canseco goes on to threaten that he might out the dealer, given the name "Max" for the interview, if he's accused of lying about the introduction.

But A-Rod has already been asked, point-blank, about using steroids (many times, it seems). Shortly after the release of the Mitchell Report, which to Canseco's surprise did not name A-Rod, Katie Couric interviewed A-Rod for 60 Minutes.

Couric: "For the record, have you ever used steroids, human growth hormone, or any other performance-enhancing substance?"

Rodriguez: "No." 

Multiple sources reported that when A-Rod was told about Canseco's latest allegations he said: "I really have absolutely no reaction."

I can see this saga following the sequence of events involving Roger Clemens and his former trainer Brian McNamee, where one allegation was made, then mocked, prompting another and another until Congress stepped in and got itself mired in the he-said/he-said too.




©1996-2008 Creative Loafing Media All Rights Reserved.   We welcome your comments and suggestions.